EURIM Newsletter and Notices – May 2003

 

1)      Competitiveness

 

The implications of the movement of added-value employment to India and the Pacific Rim

During the EURIM AGM and subsequent reception there was much discussion of political priorities for the year ahead, including the need to expedite Broadband roll-out as a matter of economic survival. It is not just call centres and data entry which are moving overseas. Software, service and design jobs are now following. The rapidly increasing availability of local fibre and wi-fi connections around the Pacific Rim and across the Americas means that the UK risks falling behind as a location for business, not just for e-business. Those interested in helping organise work on assessing global competitiveness, possibly in co-operation with partners in other EU member states, should contact emma.fryer@eurim.org

 

On 14th April the BSG aggregation group identified a number of actions to help remove the barriers to achieving critical mass and economies of scale in broadband roll-out. These included getting the main suppliers to publicise business models (not just case studies), round table meetings on the plans of the Health and Education sectors and a workshop with the Information Commissioner on the data protection issues which appear to be blocking the collation of the home connection needs of employees. This group now brings together most of the main infrastructure suppliers with a growing number of those responsible for delivering broadband applications services to all parts of the UK.

 

 

2) Modernising Government

 

Addressing the points of leverage and reviewing overall strategy

Central government and the Cabinet Office are fully committed, not just to delivering services online, but to transforming the way in which government operates, using good programme management practice. The OeE is leading a series of initiatives and OGC has produced some excellent guidance material but there is a disjoint between central government and the departments, between saying and doing, and implementation is variable. Finding ways to address the divides and identifying the partners with whom to work to achieve results, will be priorities for the year ahead. Those interested are asked to contact emma.fryer@eurim.org

 

e-Government strategy –

-  and the need to look beyond 2005

The Modernising Government white paper was published in 1999 and the e-Government Strategy in April 2000. The landscape of infrastructure and delivery models has since changed, even if the objectives have not. The proliferation of departmental initiatives has also led to uncertainty as to priorities and responsibilities for delivery. A sub-group led by Jonathan Tamblyn, LogicaCMG, is exploring the need for an updated strategic framework to show how the various initiatives fit together, including the targets for 2005 and visions beyond, to restore coherence to the overall programme, clarify roles and responsibilities, and ensure that investment is
prioritised .

 

The possible areas for work include:

  • An overview of the work to date and lessons learned to reduce future duplicated and/or wasted effort.
  • Exercises to re-focus the 2005 targets on improving functionality, particularly where this crosses departmental boundaries, rather than “merely” putting the same services online.
  • A review of the strategic framework to take account of changes since 2000, including approaches to the managing of risk.

 

Open Source in Government:

 

what is it and why does it matter?

The Office of E-Envoy supports the evaluation of Open Source solutions alongside conventional commercial software. But there is confusion as to how it is defined, what is available and when it is appropriate. This sub group has produced a draft introduction for policy makers and decision-takers which builds on the more detailed work available from the OEE and OGC.  E-mail emma.fryer@eurim.org for a review copy.

 

Social Exclusion:

 

the need to ensure that ICT aids inclusion rather than creates new forms of exclusion                           

Government has committed to addressing social exclusion problems with the Deputy Prime Minister’s Social Exclusion Unit.  Current priorities focus on transport, education and runaways but ICT technologies will underpin the vast majority of interactions, including those between the citizen and government, and can change the nature of those interactions in significant ways, including the introduction of new forms of exclusion.  An overview of the issue of social exclusion as it relates to ICT has been produced by the sub-group, led by Richard Sykes, and is currently under review. E-mail emma.fryer@eurim.org for a copy.

 

Medical Records and Systems:

 

 the need for evidence based arguments

The sub-group, led by Geoff Llewellyn, SchlumbergerSema is now working to provide scientific and professional opinion-formers with evidence-based material on the benefits of data sharing for both patients and healthcare professionals. A number of events and activities are being considered and proposals being drafted accordingly. Please e-mail davywright@ntlworld.com if you would like to be involved.

 

 

3) E-Crime

 

Building practical co-operation

On 1st May we are due to launch publicly a programme of co-operation with IPPR (and others) with the unashamed aim of setting the UK political agenda for tackling E-Crime. Over the next two months we plan to run workshops to scope the issues that need to be addressed with regard to: the balance of responsibilities, roles and procedures for investigation, designing out e-crime, skills, legal issues, reporting and small firms. Subject to participants’ priorities we may also run separate workshops on critical infrastructure and personal identity. The aim is to produce a major report in July recommending which issues and options should be covered in any government consultations in this area and how such consultations should be structured for balance and inclusion. Having identified the questions, the next stage of the exercise will be to research the possible answers.

 

We are currently working on dates, venues and invitation lists for the initial programme of workshops as well as asking members to indicate their level of interest. We are particularly looking for those likely to be active participants: hosting events, contributing funding over and above their normal subscription sponsorship and providing inputs in areas where they have particular expertise or concerns. We have had a good response to date from those already registered for the E-Crime group. Those interested but not yet registered are asked to e-mail admin@eurim.org for details.

 

The Regulation of Investigatory Powers:

putting the regulation into RIPA and retention

The Foundation for Information Policy Research and Privacy International are organising a public meeting on the Home Office data retention and access consultations from 1.30pm-5.30pm on Wednesday 14th May in the Hong Kong Theatre, Clement House, LSE, Aldwych, London WC2. Admission is free but space is limited, so please e-mail sfs6@fipr.org if you wish to attend. We are also co-operating with IEE and E-Centre on an invitation only meeting on 21st May, for those planning submissions to discuss common themes with each other and with our observers. For details please e-mail admin@eurim.org

 

 

4) Fair Dealing

 

Making a reality of alternative dispute resolution for E-Commerce and ICT

The meeting on 11th June has been confirmed and will be at 15.45 for 16.00 - 17.30 in the European Parliament Building in Brussels, hosted by Malcolm Harbour MEP. The theme will be “Alternative Disputes Resolution: A European Perspective for Consumers and Small Businesses”. The presentations and panel discussion will involve practitioners from Geneva, Madrid, Paris and Salzburg as well as London. This is primarily intended for MEPs from all parties and countries but a number of places will be available for non-parliamentary members and observers. Please e-mail ajennings@arbitrators.org for an invitation.

 

The growing controversy over Intellectual Property Rights

The EU Commission's proposal for a Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/indprop/piracy/index.htm. is expected to stir the growing debates over copyright and/or patent protection for software, as well as those over digital rights management business models, let alone technologies, for handling electronic content.

 

This is part of a broad-based approach by the Commission to tackle counterfeiting and piracy and covers infringement of all intellectual property rights (both copyright and industrial property, such as trade marks, patents and designs) deriving from Community and European law. It concentrates on infringements carried out for commercial purposes or which cause significant harm to rights holders and includes:

§         General provisions - provision of proportionate measures and procedures to enforce ipr;

§         Evidence - to enable judicial authorities to order the communication or seizure of documents;

§         Right of information - regarding the origin of goods or services thought to infringe an ipr;

§         Provisional and precautionary measures - to prevent infringement or freeze assets;

§         Measures to enable judicial authorities to order recall, disposal, destruction and prevention;

§         Damages and legal costs - at double royalties for an authorised user or actual loss and legal costs;

§         Publicity measures, criminal law provisions, technical measures, co-operation and review.

 

The proposal will be considered under the "co-decision procedure", that is by the Council of Ministers, acting by a qualified majority after obtaining an opinion from the European Parliament. The timetable is unclear, but the Competitiveness Council, who will deal with this proposal, will have its first discussion during the Greek Presidency (ie. before end June 2003). The Patent Office intends to keep interested parties informed of progress and from time may arrange open meetings to discuss the proposal.

 

Those interested, or with comments on the proposals at this stage are asked to e-mail jeff.watson@patent.gov.uk or write to Jeff Watson, The Patent Office, Concept House, Cardiff Road, Newport, NP10 8QQ, tel:+44(0)1633 813650

EURIM has started discussions with other groups looking at IPR issues on how best to work together to stage constructive debate and identify positive ways forward which encourage and reward creativity. Please e-mail admin@eurim.org if you are interested in helping drive work in this area or in active participation. Suggestions as to other groups with whom we should work in this area are also most welcome.

 

 

5) Communications Regulation

 

The Interim Plans

A well-attended workshop with DTI and Oftel on 4th April discussed the consultation on the implementation of the four EC Electronic Communications Directives under the interim implementation plan. Issues included the need to prevent existing contracts being voided by the replacement of the current licensing regime by a system of general authorizations. Any amendments to the Bill in the House of Lords will need to be reflected in the parallel statutory instruments of the Interim Implementation plan. Parliamentary lobbying and responses to the consultation should therefore be synchronised.

 

The consultation on the Interim Implementation plan and General Conditions closes on 16th May 2003 and those who have registered interest are being kept in touch with the latest drafts by e-mail. DTI-Oftel will also revise regulations under the Interim Plan and General Conditions following these consultations and in the light of any amendments to the Bill during its passage through the Lords. The aim is to have the regulations ready to be made during July if necessary.

 

A joint DTI/EURIM event on the Data Protection and Electronic Communications (Directive 2002/58/EC) consultation is planned for 9th May at 7 Millbank, Westminster, 0900-1100 hours. Please inform Dave Wright (davywright@ntlworld.com) if you wish to attend.

 

Internet Regulation

 

separating the do-able from the desirable but impractical

On 23rdApril, the Internet Regulation subgroup, chaired by Sarah Terry, AOLTW, held its scoping meeting. Many issues were raised but the meeting agreed to focus on those on which action was realistic, with recommendations as to who should do what, rather than to spend time discussing issues where there was no consensus or no solution in realistic prospect. One immediate concern was that unless effective action was taken against the proliferation of SPAM, which was now slowing down the Internet and holding back business, regulation would be inevitable. Another current topic was the common desire for a “one-stop-shop” for those with Internet problems. There were a number of initiatives in this area but it was unclear which, if any, was making serious progress. Members agreed to report back on their priorities for action, and meet again on 28th May.

 

 

6) Governance

 

After the AGM the EURIM Directors are: Brian White MP (Chairman), Giles Chichester MEP , Lord McNally, John McWilliam MP,  Margaret Moran MP, Lord Randall of St Budeaux, Lord Renwick, and Ian Colin Taylor, MBE MP. The other parliamentary members of Council are: Richard Allan MP, Christopher Chope MP, Lord Crickhowell PC, Earl of Erroll, Roger Gale MP, Malcolm Harbour MEP, Tony McWalter MP, Andrew Miller MP, Bill Olner MP, Ian Stewart MP, Robert Walter MP and Derek Wyatt MP. The non-parliamentary members are: Ian Bruce (EMTA), Duncan Chapman (Royal Mail) Carl Gibson (Energis) Chris Godwin (IBM), Anne Heal (BT), Paul Jackson (CIPFA), Lee Johnson (Computacenter), Nick Penston (CISCO), John Riley (Computer Weekly), David Roberts (tif), Mike Rodd (BCS), Jonathan Tamblyn (LogicaCMG) Malcolm Taylor (Telewest), Sarah Terry (AOL) and David Todd (Aviva)

EURIM Home Page